Nevertheless, if we get attached only to the information given by the game, the Alette's justification for entering on the most crucial battle was even more risible than mine. That was the excuse I came up with: the Viking-like battle for honor routine. Rook was a Huntmaster, not a seeking-glory soldier let it alone Alette! So why let your daughter be expose to unnecessary peril? Would not you agree? So which reasons do you have to let a beloved one enter in an avoidable battle? However, just because you are being a warriow it does not mean you have acquired a warrior's ethos. I have tried to come up with excuses to let Alette shoot the faen silver arrow, but none of them holds up!įollow my track of thought, will you? You are months on a journey, literally fighting your way to survive everyday naturally you become a seasoned warrior if you survive long enough. I mean, think about it: even if you are not "Father of the year", what kind of ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ let his own and only child into harm's way? Besides, Ekkill is a great, however emotionally expensive, character that we gain with Onef, but I digress.Īnywho, I am about to start TBS2 with Rook, but the more I think about it the more desingenuous this arc seems. I have just re-played TBS1 choosing to let Onef join in the caravan in order to properly kill Egil since I was planning to do a "Rook's Story" Alette would die and she would not need a romantic interest to a better story arc. I do not know if there is a similar topic, but I needed to vent about this, so here goes nothing!
0 kommentar(er)
